Article content

Being the loyal opposition when Trump’s tariffs are hitting Canada is a tricky job, Shuv Majumdar admits.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

Some voices treat criticism of the prime minister in a crisis as close to treason. The Calgary Conservative MP, named shadow minister for Canada-U.S. relations on June 30 — days before the July 1 CUSMA review deadline — rejects that.

Article contentWe apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

“Our country is not too brittle to have a debate where the loyal opposition — loyal to the Crown, loyal to the debate for the country — wants the best outcomes for our government and for the prime minister in a tough and unpredictable negotiation,” he says.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Prime Minister Mark Carney walked away from the table. He has framed the choice as defending sovereignty and shown little public appetite to reverse course. That may be good short-term politics. It leaves Canada waiting on Washington to blink, or living with a protracted tariff war — while Parliament has not been recalled. The House does not sit again until Sept. 21.

Article contentArticle content

I want to know how Conservatives would handle the same untenable situation. The messages from various conservative camps have not always been coherent. Majumdar, the point man on the file for eight or nine weeks, is more straightforward.

Article content

“My effort has been to be thoughtful, to be serious, to be level-headed, to not be incendiary,” he says. “To stay focused on the national interest and to hold the government accountable.”

Article content

He is not calling for silence. “Why would you not celebrate that we have a democracy where we can criticize, thoughtfully? When people say debate is treasonous, they’re undermining what opposition parties exist to do.” Civil society, journalists, think tanks and trade experts all have a role, he adds. “Maintaining freedom is very fragile. It’s so easy to concede freedom in a crisis. The harder work is to preserve that freedom through the crisis.” Canadians should have learned that during the pandemic.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

In the meantime the government is preparing support for tariff-hit businesses and an investment summit. Majumdar says Conservatives have stood with Canada and the prime minister since the new tariffs landed in July; he’s “not confident that the government has reciprocated the same statesmanship.”

Article contentRead More

  1. Alberta thinks it has a health care fix. Ottawa, as always, is skeptical
  2. The fight for Alberta’s ‘soft separatists’ — the conservatives who want to send Carney a message
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

He recalls how in the Harper years, the government briefed the opposition. Critics such as the late NDP MP Paul Dewar were taken into confidence on Ukraine, ISIS, TPP and CETA. Majumdar’s confident Harper did the same with Tom Mulcair. Justin Trudeau sent border-town MPs to Congress; Chrystia Freeland used a non-disclosure process with journalists and experts. “We have not seen any of that in a year and a half,” Majumdar says. Pierre Poilievre’s New York swing this week — apparently with PMO blessing — looks like a shift toward a common front. Fine; but it still leaves the Opposition unbriefed on the talks, the deal text unpublished, and Parliament un-recalled.

Article content

Majumdar’s core demand is simple: release the text. “Reveal the deal, share the deal, read the opposition or others into the deal so people actually have a better understanding of what was comprehensively on the table, what was the decision point to walk away, and let people judge for themselves.”