Article content

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

Canada will wind up hurting itself with its latest counter-tariffs based on the outcome of retaliatory duties levied nearly 100 years ago, says the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI).

Article contentWe apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

Canada is set to unleash on Sept. 8 $28-billion worth of tariffs ranging from 15 per cent to 50 per cent on imports from the United States. The federal government said the goods targeted will mirror the list of Canadian products hit with 50 per cent tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on  Aug. 22 after trade talks between the two sides broke down.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Ottawa said the Canadian countermeasures will focus on sectors — including steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper and electronics — “that are most impacted by U.S. tariffs.”

Article contentArticle content

However, the MEI doesn’t think much of Canada’s counterpunch.

Article content

“Lowering ourselves to Trump-style protectionism won’t help us protect free trade,” Vincent Geloso, senior economist at the MEI and author of a report released on Thursday, said in a release.

Article content

The MEI said retaliatory tariffs will harm Canada in a couple of ways.

Article content

First, they will increase the cost of imports, resulting in negative economic consequences, including reducing the competitiveness of some exports.

Article content

They will also slow growth because they will hinder competitive pressure and any possible gains from scale and specialization.

Article content

Counter-tariffs also encourage interest groups to spend money on lobbying to keep the levies in place, diverting resources away from efforts to improve productivity, which is “a far larger drag” on growth, the MEI said.

Article content

“Not only are counter-tariffs generally harmful, with major downsides, but the supposed upsides as a policy tool for influencing the trade policies of other nations are tiny, if not nonexistent, for small economies like Canada’s,” it said.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

As proof, the MEI looked back to the 1930s when the U.S. instituted Smoot-Hawley tariffs. Canada’s government at the time said it would impose retaliatory tariffs and it ultimately did, affecting 30 per cent of exports from the U.S. with the average tariff increasing around 20 per cent.

Article contentRead More

  1. Posthaste: Markets predict three Bank of Canada rates hikes are coming and some economists agree
  2. Posthaste: AI boom could triple data centre water consumption this decade, warns energy researcher
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Canada eventually repealed its tariffs and a new Democratic government in the U.S. in 1932 changed trade policy with the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act.

Article content

“At no point did the Canadian counter-tariffs have any discernible effect on American trade policy,” the MEI said.

Article content

Royal Bank of Canada also said retaliatory tariffs will raise prices for Canadians, but there is a “nuance” when it comes to counter-tariffs because Canada imports more of the items on the U.S. hit list than it exports.

Article content

That means Canadian companies could potentially redirect some of their buys to domestic suppliers, though the more likely outcome is increased costs for companies on both sides of the border since their supply chains are highly integrated.

Article content

“But there is likely more potential for trade flows to reorient within North America to avoid increased tariff costs with these measures than some of the other sector-specific tariffs imposed to date,” RBC said in a note after trade negotiations ended on Aug. 21.