Article content

Thirty years ago, women’s golf was scandalized when CBS sports commentator Ben Wright allegedly claimed that women were “handicapped” by virtue of having breasts, which, he stupidly claimed, would “get in the way” of their golf swings.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

At the time, many offered a low-hanging retort to Wright: that male anatomy should, by his logic, prevent men from being effective runners. The world had a laugh, and women’s golf emerged unscathed. (While Wright ultimately lost his job over this, plus other offensive comments.)

Article content

Recommended Videos

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Considering what scandalizes women’s golf in 2026, one can fondly recall the Wright incident as a quaint scuffle that preceded the real battle of the sexes in sports: namely, the invasion of the female category by biological males.

Article contentArticle content

This summer, two transgender-identifying golfers Veronica Ivy and Rachel Elser, won five women’s golf championships in Alberta and British Columbia. Collectively, they’ve taken the Fort McMurray Club Championship, the 2026 Miskanaw Ladies Open, the Chilliwack Golf Club Women’s Mid-Amateur, and Women’s Mid-Master, and one unidentified club championship.

Article content

Ivy previously competed in women’s cycling under the name Rachel McKinnon — and won the women’s World Masters title for 2018 and 2019. At the time, McKinnon accused those who called the wins unfair of engaging in “hate speech” and “transphobia.” More famously, Ivy also told female detractors to “die in a grease fire.”

Article content

Addressing detractors after the recent golf wins, one of Ivy’s social media posts from last month reads: “To the bigots: stay mad, and get a better hobby. You’re deeply unwell and you’re obsessed with harassing a stranger. You’re not going to make me stop existing and succeeding. I feel really sorry for you. You have my pity.”

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Ivy and Esler are only partly to blame for their unfair wins. They were enabled by a 2025 Alberta Golf policy change that allows golfers to compete in the category corresponding with their professed gender, rather than their sex.

Article contentRead More

  1. Amy Hamm: Attack ad with David Eby dressed as a communist could backfire
  2. Amy Hamm: Carney, release the deal
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

The policy stipulates that adult males “who have undergone gender reassignment after puberty” can compete as women after one year of hormone therapy, with medical documentation. Females, by contrast, can begin to compete in the men’s category at any point after providing medical documentation. Finally, “(a)ny transgender Golfer who is not taking hormone treatment related to gender reassignment may participate in sex-separated events in accordance with their assigned birth gender,” the policy reads.

Article content

By virtue of creating different rules for males and females who identify as trans, including those who’ve not taken hormones, Alberta Golf has conceded that there are biological differences in sport performance between the sexes. Despite the attempt at nuanced rules, their policy does not mitigate biology — and is still grossly unfair to women. There is a reason that not a single female-to-male transgender athlete has ever dominated in male sports. That reason is obvious to anyone who practices intellectual honesty.