Article content
Canadian mandates on race-based hiring quotas in academia have done measurable damage to the country’s research productivity, according to a new report by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
Sign In or Create an Account
or View more offersArticle content
Ever since 2017, Canadian universities have been subject to strict identity-based hiring quotas as a condition of receiving federal research funding.
Article content
Recommended Videos
We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content
In recent years, this has resulted in a regular stream of academic job postings that are explicitly barred to straight, white men. Newfoundland’s Memorial University, for instance, advertised a tranche of five new jobs in April that were open only to “women; 2SLGBTQIA+ people; Indigenous peoples; racialized persons; and persons with disabilities.”
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
And according to a 54-page report published Tuesday, all of this identity-based hiring has yielded a notable drop off in the amount of Canadian research being published or cited by other scholars.
Article contentArticle content
“Our analysis … confirms that diversity is not merely neutral but can lower performance,” reads the conclusion of The Equity-Excellence Tradeoff report.
Article content
It added, “all told, ending EDI (equity, diversity and inclusion) initiatives in Canadian research should be a top priority for any responsible government.”
Article content
The report zeroed in on the $311-million per year Canada Research Chair program, the federal research fund with the most overt strictures on identity-based hiring.
Article content
The program funds 2,285 university-based Canada Research Chairs whose salary and office expenses are covered entirely by federal grant money. For a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair, for instance, schools receive $200,000 a year. For Tier 2, it’s $100,000 per year.
Article content
In return, schools must submit to federally set quotas on the race, gender and sexual characteristics of the researchers they’re allowed to hire.
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
According to the most recent “equity targets” published by the Government of Canada, Canada Research Chairs must be 22 per cent “racialized,” 4.9 per cent “Indigenous” and 50.9 per cent “women and gender equity-seeking groups.”
Article contentRead More
- ‘It’s virtue signaling’: DEI has captured corporate Canada, think tank says
- Majority of Canadians oppose equity hiring — more than in the U.S., new poll finds
- Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
These targets take the form of regularly updated tables in which individual universities are told the precise number of Canada Research Chairs they’re required to hire in one of four “equity-deserving” groups.
Article content
McGill University’s most recent equity quotas, for instance, require the school to hire 34 “racialized” Canada Research Chairs, five Indigenous Canada Research Chairs and 10 “persons with disabilities.”
Article content
The Canada Research Chair program began in 2000, but its identity mandates started only in 2017 under the oversight of then prime minister Justin Trudeau. And in just nine years, the effect has been precipitous.
Article content
At the program’s launch, 80 per cent of Canada Research Chairs were white males. As of 2025, white males comprised just 25 per cent of the total.
Article content
Macdonald-Laurier Institute analysts ranked the productivity of Canada Research Chairs both before and after the identity mandates.