Article content

For those of us who are old enough to remember where we were on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, it is hard to believe that 25 years have passed. On this anniversary, I can’t help but wonder what Osama bin Laden, the mastermind behind those infamous terrorist attacks, would make of the world today.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

West’s inward turn

Article content

Recommended Videos

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

Bin Laden knew he could not defeat the United States by conventional military means, but he could terrorize, demoralize and try to persuade the West that it did not deserve to win. In his 2002 “Letter to the American People,” alongside the expected demands about Muslim lands and Israel, he attacked Americans for usury, drugs, gambling and sexual licence, blamed them for AIDS, denounced corporate money in election campaigns, condemned the atomic bombing of Japan and reproached Washington for refusing to sign the Kyoto accord.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

As the Hudson Institute’s Paul Marshall has observed, bin Laden had spent a decade issuing statements that mentioned none of these things. But in this letter, bin Laden submerged his theology and borrowed the West’s own case against itself, attempting to appeal to western audiences through their own grievances. The gambit failed in 2002. But 25 years after 9/11, we seem to have become much more receptive to the case bin Laden was trying to make against the West.

Article contentArticle content

The West now instructs its own children to hold it in contempt. Its classrooms, newsrooms and cultural institutions run a permanent seminar on western sin, while non-western societies whose conduct is immeasurably worse are treated as victims and granted a standing exemption from judgment.

Article content

Hudson Institute researcher Zineb Riboua calls this ideology “Third-Worldism”: the belief that world politics is fundamentally divided between a dominating North and a dominated South, with conflicts understood through the binary of colonizer and colonized. The categories carry their own moral verdict: those assigned the status of oppressed are granted legitimacy, while those deemed powerful are presumed guilty, regardless of who is actually exercising power or perpetuating oppression in a particular conflict.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Changing sympathies towards Israel is where the growing Third-Worldism is easiest to see. For most of this century, Americans overwhelmingly sympathized with Israel over Palestinians: according to Gallup, between 2001 and 2018, “Israelis consistently held double-digit leads in Americans’ Middle East sympathies, with the gap averaging 43 points.” Today, a plurality of Americans sympathize with the Palestinians. Among Democrats, 65 per cent now sympathize with the Palestinians and just 17 per cent with Israel. And independents have crossed over, too. Last year, they favoured Israel by eight points; today they favour the Palestinians by 11.

Article contentRead More

  1. Terry Glavin: 25 years after 9/11, the West has given up
  2. Joe Adam George: Canada hasn’t learned from the 9/11 attacks how to keep terrorists out
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

But Riboua’s point is that the argument does not stop there. Anyone persuaded that Israel is a colonial imposition has already accepted the premise that convicts the United States, Canada and every other western country. Israel is simply the first stop.

Article content

For bin Laden, a worldview that cast his enemies as oppressors and their adversaries as victims would have been an extraordinary gift.

Article content

Antisemitism normalized

Article content

Jew-hatred is foundational to Islamist ideology, and bin Laden did not conceal it. The fatwa he issued in February 1998, three years before the attacks, was titled “Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders.” It ruled that killing Americans and their allies, civilian and military, was a duty for every Muslim able to do it, anywhere in the world, “in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque (Mecca) from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim.”