Article content

With the first Canada Investment Summit opening this week, Prime Minister Mark Carney is courting foreign investors to play a central role in financing this country’s major infrastructure and resource development projects.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

Given the government’s target of $1 trillion in total investment spending over the next five years, outside capital is a must. But at that scale, foreign direct investment (FDI) risks compromising our ability to govern and control strategic assets, potentially undermining sovereignty and national security. To reduce those risks and better protect key technology and assets, our national security review guidelines need to be updated to include automatic trigger thresholds.

Article contentWe apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

The Investment Canada Act has two frameworks for assessing deals. The “net benefit” review asks whether an investment is good for the country and economy, while the national security review asks whether it threatens our security. But while the net benefit review is triggered when the size of the company being purchased passes a specific threshold, the national security review has no mandatory thresholds, leaving the decision entirely to the discretion of the minister of industry, currently Melanie Joly.

Article contentArticle content

Reviewing foreign investment has always been rooted in national security concerns, though sometimes by other names. The Foreign Investment Review Agency, created in 1973, screened ownership seen then as a U.S. challenge to sovereignty. The Investment Canada Act replaced it in 1985 with a narrower “net benefit” test, which includes consideration of “strategic assets” held by the company, and in 2009 Ottawa added the national security review, strengthened repeatedly since, most recently by Bill C-34 in 2024.

Article content

These approaches have all aimed at keeping sovereignty and strategic capacity in Canada, but they have blocked shockingly few purchases. In fifty years, only two foreign takeovers have been rejected on net benefit grounds.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Meanwhile, companies with strategic assets continue to be sold off. In August, RBC and BMO agreed to sell Moneris, which handles payments at more than 325,000 points of commerce, to American private equity firm Francisco Partners for roughly $2 billion, just under the $2.179 billion threshold that triggers an automatic net benefit review. Banking and payment infrastructure are sectors that legislation recognizes as vital to national security.

Article contentRead More

  1. Carney touts ‘new, powerful, confident’ Canada to business leaders
  2. Some of Canada’s biggest financial players are promising billions of dollars
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

What is needed? A mandatory trigger. Any investment touching a strategic sector should require the company to notify and require the minister’s office to give reasons why it will not review, if it chooses not to. Parliament has already half-built such a mechanism. Bill C-34 created the power to require pre-closing filings in “prescribed business activities” in 2024, but two and a half years later the regulations defining those activities still have not been written. Bill C-8’s list of vital services and systems (nuclear, banking, telecommunications, pipelines and power lines, transportation, clearing and settlement) offers a starting point.