Article content

Prime Minister Mark Carney said he doesn’t believe in escalating the trade war with the U.S., but he argued counter-tariffs are necessary to cushion the blow for Canadian businesses and workers.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

As Canadian retaliatory tariffs kicked in on Tuesday, Carney addressed the deterioration in trade relations with the U.S., as well as his government’s economic plan.

Article contentWe apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

“I don’t believe in escalating the conflict, that’s not constructive, but our tariffs are necessary to protect our workers, protect our companies and our communities,” Carney said in a video posted on social media. “We can’t let American goods into Canada tariff-free while they charge our companies to export.”

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Adversity only makes us stronger. It always has.

Watch the new edition of Forward Guidance: https://t.co/75rhccwqIC pic.twitter.com/GGCzmb0k26

— Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) September 8, 2026

Article content

Carney’s government increased the import tax on many U.S. steel items to 50 per cent from 25 per cent, and applied tariffs to a range of consumer goods — motorcycles, cosmetics, cheese and more — at 12:01 a.m. New York time. The levies were in response to so-called Section 338 tariffs on US$20 billion of Canadian goods, which came into effect Aug. 22 following the breakdown in trade talks.

Article contentArticle content

The Section 338 tariffs, which apply to products regardless of whether they’re shipped under the North American free trade agreement, are sufficient to virtually halt U.S. imports of those goods, according to an analysis by Bloomberg Economics. That would put roughly 0.8 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product directly at risk in the short term, cutting long-term GDP by 0.2 per cent relative to the 2024 baseline.

Article content

U.S. President Donald Trump has been increasingly hostile toward Canada since the negotiations ended and Carney vowed to retaliate. He signed an order renaming Lake Ontario as Lake America, threatened to increase tariffs on Canadian cars to 50 per cent next year and pledged to restrict Bombardier from selling jets in the U.S.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Carney said the “harsh reality” of the U.S. tariffs are meant to hurt some Canadians more than others “by design.” The Section 338 tariffs disproportionately affect Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia — the largest provinces that have retaliated against U.S. tariffs by pulling American alcohol from government-run liquour store shelves.

Article contentRead More

  1. Canada imposes tariffs up to 50% on U.S., risking wider trade war
  2. Lutnick blames Carney, politics for collapse of trade talks
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

“This won’t be easy, and I won’t pretend otherwise. But Canadians have faced difficult stretches before, and what’s carried us through has never ever been just one measure,” the prime minister said, adding that the most “powerful action” has come from Canadians who have chosen to buy local and travel within the country.

Article content

A recent Nanos Research Group survey conducted on behalf of Bloomberg News shows Carney enjoys broad support for his approach to the U.S.

Article content

Carney also reinforced his government’s plan to fast-track major infrastructure projects in Canada and grow free-trade relationships with other countries. He said over the next six months, Canada will double its tariff-free access to 3 billion consumers.

Article content

“There’s always a cost to action. But it doesn’t come close to the cost of standing still,” Carney said.

Article content

Bloomberg.com

Article content