Article content
A U.S. federal judge on Wednesday refused to force Google to sell a division of its digital advertising business, rejecting the government’s push to break up part of the company’s ad empire.
Sign In or Create an Account
or View more offersArticle content
In a court order, U.S. District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema opted instead for a set of rules governing how Google must operate in the ad market.
Article contentArticle content
The decision is the second time in recent years that a federal judge has declined to dismantle a piece of Google’s business, after a judge last year refused to force the sale of its Chrome browser in a separate monopoly case over online search.
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Those cases are part of a broader effort by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to curtail the competitive dominance of big tech companies, including Apple, Amazon and Meta.
Article contentArticle content
Results have been mixed, with another judge deciding against government lawyers in a suit concerning Meta’s social media empire, but other decision going the government’s way.
Article content
“We’re very pleased the Court rejected the DOJ’s proposal to break apart tools that help small businesses reach new customers and grow,” Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland said in a statement.
Article content
The reasoning behind today’s decision was not immediately made public.
Article content
Brinkema filed her opinion under seal for 14 days, leaving the details of how Google must change its ad business unknown for now. She gave the two sides 30 days to submit a joint proposed final judgment.
Article content
The case focused on Google’s ad tech “stack” — the suite of tools that website publishers use to sell ads and advertisers use to buy them.
Article content
Brinkema — whose court is in Alexandria, Virginia outside Washington — ruled last year that Google had willfully monopolized both the publisher ad server and ad exchange markets, and had unlawfully tied the two products together. Google has said it will appeal the underlying liability ruling.
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
The government’s case portrayed Google as simultaneously controlling multiple sides of the digital advertising marketplace, owning the platform that publishers use to sell ads as well as the exchange where transactions occur, all while commanding huge advertiser demand.
Article contentRead More
- Ashley MacIsaac ends defamation lawsuit over Google AI claim he was a sex offender
- Google says changes to Canada’s police search powers bill haven’t eased concerns
- Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
According to the Department of Justice, Google once compared this arrangement to Goldman Sachs owning the New York Stock Exchange.
Article content
Prosecutors had sought the sale of Google’s ad auction site AdX and the open-sourcing of critical auction technology.
Article content
Google characterized the proposed remedies as extreme government overreach that would harm publishers, advertisers and consumers. It had also argued that splitting up the service would be technically unfeasible.
Article content
At closing arguments last year, Brinkema questioned how long a forced sale would take and noted that no buyer for AdX had been identified.
Article content
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.
Article content