Article content

The word “female” is so objectionable to our federal government that it cannot even be used in a court case involving women being sexually abused in prison.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

“Cisgender woman” is the preferred term used by the Canadian government allegedly for reasons of “clarity and accuracy.”

Article content

Recommended Videos

We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

Cisgender woman, as opposed to female, is used “to refer to individuals whose gender identity corresponds to the gender assigned to them at birth based on observed sexual characteristics,” says the government in a recent statement of defence.”

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

It adds that the “use of the term ‘female’ to refer solely to cisgender women risks mischaracterizing or misgendering gender diverse inmates, and this Defence avoids that usage for clarity and accuracy.”

Article contentArticle content

Having erased female as a category, is it any wonder that the government goes on to argue that putting biological males into women’s prisons is fine as long as they identify as women?

Article content

Further, the government insists that if the women inmates — the biological females — are sexually assaulted by the “gender diverse” prisoners — the biological men — that it is not a breach of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Article content

This is not just madness, it is unhinged, demented and dangerous lunacy.

Article content

Last year, Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, wrote a report condemning gender ideology because it was deleting women from society.

Article content

“The erosion of women and sex specific language, the conflation of sex, gender and gender identity” was weakening protection for mothers, women and girls, she said in a speech before producing her report.

Article content

She might have added that it has weakened protection for female prisoners in Canada.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Only in Canada can we have a judge saying bike lanes are protected by the Charter but the federal government arguing that women at risk of being sexually abused in prison aren’t.

Article contentRead More

  1. Amy Hamm: Tribunal punishes doc for conscientious objection to puberty blockers
  2. Anthony Furey: Can Toronto rid itself of Mayor Olivia Chow?
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

“Canada’s accommodation of the needs of gender diverse inmates does not infringe the rights guaranteed to cisgender women under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the Canadian Bill of Rights,” says the statement of defence.

Article content

“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person,” says Section 7 of the Charter, but that doesn’t apply to female inmates, according to our Liberal government.

Article content

The government was forced to file a defence after the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) helped launch a lawsuit challenging the Correctional Service of Canada’s policy of allowing “trans-identifying male inmates” to be housed in women’s prisons. The policy “exposes female inmates to physical and psychological harm and violates their Charter rights,” argues the JCCF.

Article content

“The lawsuit claims that this practice is cruel and unusual punishment and violates the Charter rights of female inmates, including their right to be protected from mental, physical, and sexual abuse,” the JCCF says in a statement.