Article content
‘National identity now matters as much as economic well-being to a large share of the country’
Sign In or Create an Account
or View more offersArticle content
Re: Doug Ford’s veto of a U.S. trade deal cannot stand — John Ivison; and Trade war was never about sovereignty — Michael Higgins, both Aug. 31
Article contentWe apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content
Reading John Ivison’s Sept. 1 column on the trade talks and Michael Higgins’ column on the same immediately afterwards was edifying. They both grasped the immediate economic cost of the ongoing trade war. But one largely missed the deeper national anger over the attacks on our sovereignty. Together they illuminated why the collapse of Canada-U.S. negotiations is not just another trade spat.
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Like Ivison, Canadians are not stupid. They get that it is about the economy: jobs, GDP, supply chains, the risk of auto tariffs climbing to 50 per cent if Canada accepts terms that violate the letter and spirit of the 2018 CUSMA, terms Ottawa has long called illegal under the agreement. Accepting them would mean endorsing the principle that a signed free-trade deal is written in pencil, erasable whenever Washington feels like it. That is the economic and legal heart of the resistance.
Article contentArticle content
But national identity now matters as much as economic well-being to a large share of the country. Call it hubris. Call it misguided. It is real. The “51st state” threats, the “governor” jibes, the casual insults directed at Canadians as being “nasty,” are affecting us. Maybe none of it should matter, and reason should win out over passion, but when a U.S. president can order the renaming of Lake Ontario, the body of water shared with Canada’s most populous province, to “Lake America,” the message is unmistakable: Washington defines the map, the terms, and the identity of Ontarians.
Article content
Prime Minister Mark Carney and Ontario Premier Doug Ford may be playing partisan politics. But Canadians largely do not mind. The alternative, appearing as a country whose major industries can be slowly dismantled, whose cultural and language protections can be bargained down, whose sovereignty can be subordinated, cuts deeper than a temporary GDP hit. A GDP decline registers on a spreadsheet. A sense of self does not.
Article content
Story continues below
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
This is about more than a trade war. It is about who gets to define Canada’s place and its own self-identification. Canadians are being undeservedly maligned, mistreated, and they know it. Higgins focused on the economic arithmetic and found the walk-away costly. He is not wrong on the numbers. He simply does not reach the heart of the dispute: for many Canadians, a diminished sense of independence, the freedom to be true to ourselves, is the more meaningful loss.
Article contentRead More
- Letters: Pull the plug on Trump’s ‘Lake America’
- Letters: Praying the feds see the light about Armed Forces chaplains
- Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Tony D’Andrea, Toronto
Article contentArticle content
‘Who would ever want to serve under Pete Hegseth?’
Article content
Re: Carney tells U.S. to stop ‘doing memes’ and ‘throwing shade’ as war of words escalates — Christopher Nardi, Sept. 1; and Pete Hegseth’s post just the latest ‘frat boy’ insult to Canada, academics say — Chris Knight, Sept. 1
Article content
When I was a recruit at the Royal Military College 50 years ago, the College Sergeant Major was a man who reportedly weighed 380 pounds at the time. No matter. The Sergeant Major was a 30-year infantry veteran whose distinguished career had included wartime service in Korea. He was, literally, a larger-than-life presence who was respected and well-liked by the cadets, someone who was a father figure to many of us, myself included.