We independently select everything we recommend. Buying through us may earn us a commission, which supports our work.

Article content

Married couple Tom,* 61, and Judy, 63, are at an inflection point. Judy retired just over a year ago and loves it. Tom plans to retire in two years. He’s happy to retire sooner, if possible, so long as they can achieve their target after-tax annual retirement income of $120,000 indexed to inflation.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

Tom and Judy have built an investment portfolio valued at approximately $1.16 million, largely in registered retirement savings plans ($620,000) and Judy’s locked-in retirement account ($460,000). These accounts are 75 per cent invested in equities. They also have approximately $80,000 in tax-free savings accounts, with 65 per cent invested in equities.

Article contentWe apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

If Tom does retire in 2028, he will be eligible to receive an annual defined benefit indexed employer pension income of approximately $100,000 with lifetime survivor benefits for Judy valued at 66 per cent of the pension.

Article contentArticle content

They are confident they have enough money to see them through retirement. Their financial focus now is tax efficiency and how to strategically draw down the wealth they have accumulated.

Article content

Should Tom delay his employer pension until age 65 or later to minimize the couple’s tax costs? At what age should they start receiving Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) benefits and begin withdrawing from their RRSPs?

Article content

When Tom does retire, the couple are considering a shift to a bicoastal lifestyle. This could potentially see them divide their time between British Columbia, where their son lives, and their longtime home of Nova Scotia, where they own their principal residence and a cottage.

Article content

At this point they are exploring their options and looking for advice to determine the most financially responsible approach. For example, should they purchase or rent a home in British Columbia, where house prices are much higher than Nova Scotia but where tax rates are much lower? Should they sell their principal home, currently valued at approximately $750,000, to help fund a new home on the West Coast and keep their East Coast cottage to use in the summer – at least for the next few years?

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Tom asked, “If we cleared $750,000 from the sale of our home in Nova Scotia, what is the outer envelope that we could spend on a new home in British Columbia that would effectively mean breaking even in terms of the additional mortgage debt versus the tax benefits of changing our province of residence?”

Article contentRead More

  1. With $2.4 million in assets, does George need to double that to retire at 50?
  2. Can a GIC-only RRSP, TFSA and LIRA generate enough for Miles’s retirement?
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

The cottage is conservatively valued at $500,000 and has a mortgage of approximately $190,000 at 3.99 per cent for the next three years. The only other debt Tom and Judy have is a $70,000 home equity line of credit against the cottage. If they do purchase a home in British Columbia and take on a mortgage, when they are ready to sell their cottage those proceeds could be used to pay down that additional debt, if that is the best option.

Article content

The couple don’t want the emotional comfort of being debt-free to create a blind spot in how they move forward. “We know that the choices we make now are really important,” said Judy.

Article content

What the expert says

Article content

According to Ed Rempel, a fee-for-service financial planner, tax accountant and blogger, for Tom to retire in two years and achieve the couple’s desired retirement income of $120,000 after tax, he and Judy will need $510,000. They have $1.16 million. “They are 128 per cent ahead of their goal – a comfortable margin of safety.”