Article content

OTTAWA – U.S. Senator from Arizona Ruben Gallego tempered expectations around the prospect of Democrats gaining a majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate and using that power to curtail U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

“I do think they’ll use their power,” said Gallego, during a press conference at the U.S. embassy in Ottawa on Tuesday. “The question is, do you have enough to overcome vetoes and things of that nature.”

Article contentWe apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Democrats are hopeful that they will have good results during the Nov. 3 midterm elections, amid Trump’s low approval ratings.

Article contentArticle content

Gallego, who was in Ottawa visiting with embassy staff and Canadian politicians to discuss the ongoing trade dispute, said Congress and the Senate have historically given up too much of their power to the president when it comes to trade policy.

Article content

Trump has applied most of his tariffs through executive action. The tariffs he enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court in February, but the president has since found other pieces of legislation to apply more levies on goods from other countries.

Article content

The president also has the power to veto legislation.

Article content

“There’s going to be a strong incentive for Democrats to actually engage on oversight when it comes to tariffs,” said Gallego. “The…number one reason why is because by the Constitution, it’s the Senate and Congress in general that actually has tariff policy.”

Article content

Canada walked away from a potential interim trade deal with the U.S. on Aug. 21, after weeks of negotiations between Canadian and American officials.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

The potential deal would have provided tariff relief on Section 232 levies on Canadian autos, steel and aluminum, as well as the avoidance of a 50 per-cent tariff under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which applies to $28 billion worth of Canadian goods. In exchange, Canada would have ended its moratoriums on U.S. alcohol in several provinces and dropped tariffs on American autos.

Article contentRead More

  1. Carney tells U.S. to stop ‘doing memes’ and ‘throwing shade’ as war of words escalates
  2. Economists have some ideas about how to Trump-proof the economy
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Prime Minister Mark Carney ultimately decided to hit pause on negotiations, citing several last-minute demands on the U.S. side that made the deal untenable.

Article content

Canada has now threatened dollar-for-dollars tariffs on U.S. goods, which are set to take effect Sept. 8, in response to the Section 338 tariffs.

Article content

The prospect of Canada gaining tariff-free access to the American market remains in question for the time being.

Article content

Last week, California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is a Democrat hopeful for the presidency in 2028, told CTV News he could not guarantee the complete removal of tariffs.

Article content

Gallego said he could not clarify what Newsom meant in terms of his comments, but said it should be his party’s goal to remove tariffs.