Article content

Name change ‘rightly evoked an emotional response’

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

Re: Trump signs executive order to rename Lake Ontario as Lake America — Chris Knight, Aug. 27

Article contentWe apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.We apologize, but this video has failed to load.Try refreshing your browser, or
tap here to see other videos from our team.Article content

President Donald Trump’s renaming of Lake Ontario to Lake America has rightly evoked an emotional response from Canadians. While “Lake America” will likely have the staying power of “Freedom Fries” — coined by Americans in 2003 when France wouldn’t support the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq — it is hard to ignore the irony that Canada has been renaming its own streets, towns and geographical features for the past decade. I hope this ordeal illustrates the practical folly of changing well-established names and reboots Canadians’ pride in their history and institutions.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Clint Stibbard, West Vancouver

Article contentArticle contentArticle content

For generations, we’ve remembered the names of the Great Lakes by using the acronym HOMES: Huron, Ontario, Michigan, Erie, Superior.

Article content

With “Lake America,” we may need a new acronym: SHAME (Superior, Huron, America, Michigan, Erie).

Article content

A fitting one, unfortunately, for the state of Canada-U.S. trade talks.

Article content

Adina Silberman, Bronx, N.Y.

Article contentArticle content

It could be that renaming Lake Ontario is not merely a joke or another way for President Donald Trump to insult Canada. It could be a sneaky way for him to solve America’s freshwater shortage. Canada needs to fight this name change and ensure that our water rights on the lake (of which we own 53 per cent) are not diminished.

Article content

Morton Cohen, Toronto

Article contentArticle content

Donald Trump has now “renamed” both the Gulf of Mexico (“Gulf of America”) and Lake Ontario (“Lake America”).

Article content

Both these two pre-Columbian place names are of Indigenous origin. “Mexico” is said to have originated in the ethnonym Mexica, which referred to the Aztecs. As for “Ontario,” it comes from the Wendat word “Oniatarí:io,” which meant “great/beautiful lake” or “lake of shining waters.” The Wendat were displaced by the Iroquois, who retained the name. “America,” on the other hand, is a place name of European origin referring to the explorer Amerigo Vespucci.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

By changing these centuries-old place names, the budding cartographer Trump is attacking not only Mexico and Canada, but also the heritage of the Indigenous peoples who inhabited the Americas long before Christopher Columbus arrived.

Article contentRead More

  1. Letters: Praying the feds see the light about Armed Forces chaplains
  2. Letters: Are we falling prisoner to Trumped-up falsehoods?
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Trump is also reported to be considering renaming an ocean. If he sets his sights on the Pacific Ocean, he will undoubtedly want to rename it the “Warrior Ocean.” Hasn’t he already renamed the Department of Defence the “War Department,” much to the delight of Pete Hegseth, the bellicose Secretary of War?

Article content

If this last change is adopted, it would have the added bonus (in Trump’s eyes) of displeasing the governor of California (whose coastline stretches for more than 1,300 kilometres along the Pacific) — Gavin Newsom, his fiercest opponent.

Article content

Sylvio Le Blanc, Montreal

Article contentArticle content

The rain does come

Article content

Re: Freeland calls Trump ‘bully in chief’ in scathing rebuke — Chris Knight, July 28

Article content

Chrystia Freeland, as Justin Trudeau’s finance minister, was fully complicit in his decision to massively increase Canada’s debt. But in the end, even she could not stomach the recklessness of those budgets, the willing blindness her boss showed as he spent on pet projects and programs while killing the goose laying golden eggs, and ignoring the unavoidable catastrophe to come. It took Freeland too long to realize that when Trudeau stated that it was his understanding that budgets balance themselves, he actually believed it.