Article content

OTTAWA — Indigenous lawyer Leighton Grey was the surprise star of an Alberta independence rally at the provincial legislature in Edmonton over the weekend.

Sign In or Create an Account

or View more offersArticle content

Grey, a criminal defence attorney and Carry the Kettle Nakoda Nation member based in Cold Lake, Alta., delighted the pro-independence crowd when he laid out his vision for a future Alberta where all citizens are treated equally under the law.

Article contentArticle content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

“To the government, (and) I’m talking about the federal government now, I’m the other. I’m an Indian,” said Grey. “Which is to say I live in an apartheid state. That’s what Canada is.”

Article contentArticle content

“If we’re going to create the greatest society, a new Alberta that’s free and prosperous, that society has to be one that unifies Indigenous peoples and, as Albertans, invites them into the community that ends the otherness,” he finished to applause.

Article content

Grey made the case, through his 20-minute speech, that the Indian Act of 1876 set the Indigenous on a separate, and inferior, path from the non-Indigenous.

Article content

“They call us the First Nations, but I find we’re first in all the wrong things and we’re last in all the good things,” said Grey.

Article content

He said he didn’t understand why the Indigenous groups fighting the referendum on separation want to continue a “dysfunctional relationship” with Ottawa.

Article content

“What I would say to these chiefs who are pleading and going to court and trying to stop Alberta independence, explain to me how this relationship is good for our people. Because I’m just a dumb country lawyer, but it goes way over my head,” said Grey to another round of applause.

Article content

Story continues below

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

Grey said the way to break the “cycle of abuse” was by voting for Option 2 in the Oct. 19 referendum on separation.

Article contentRead More

  1. Trump administration staying out of Alberta separation referendum, ambassador says
  2. Alberta wins praise for stressing Indigenous support in new pipeline plan
  3. Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content

His self-assessment as a “dumb country lawyer” undersells his impressive resume, which includes, among many other accolades, becoming Alberta’s youngest lawyer appointed to the King’s Counsel in 2010 and being named one of Canada’s Top 50 Lawyers in 2024.

Article content

National Post spoke to Grey about his support for Alberta independence. This interview has been edited for clarity and length.

Article content

The referendum is in six weeks and polls show most Albertans have already decided how they’ll vote. Why wait until now to make your case for independence?

Article content

I was not personally involved in the referendum drive. I’ve just, more or less, been a speaker who’s invited to attend various events. What’s pushed me to jump into the fray a bit more has been the oppositional attitude toward the referendum that’s been taken by the premier (Danielle Smith). If I had known, say six or nine months ago, that she’d be taking this stance, I probably would have done things differently.

Article content

Much of the reporting heading into the referendum has framed the pro-independence side as racist and anti-Indigenous — and not without the help of comments made by some of its purported leaders. Do you think you could have weakened this narrative by taking a more visible role earlier on?

Article content

Well, I have a lot of respect for what people like Mitch Sylvestre and Jeff Rath have done to bring this issue to the forefront, and I’d never want to disparage those guys. But one of the things the independence movement lacks right now is a clear leader that can set the tone and establish message discipline. There’s no question that the other side has used this against us.